Відео

What in the world are you talking about? 4 different countries have sent lunar orbiters with cameras that have detected the Apollo landing sites (Japan, China, USA, and India). 3 of those orbiters' cameras had the resolution required to see the landers (China, USA, India). 2 of those orbiters' cameras had the resolution required to see the foot paths, rover tracks, etc. (USA, India). Yet, with hundreds of orbital photos of the landing sites, provided by different countries, the deniers continue to deny, and simply conclude that there's a new wave of countries participating in "the deception." What difference would a rover make? You know you'll just reject any photos it sends back home anyway. Why do you ask for things that you know, in advance, that you'll reject if you receive what you ask for?

The "air" is inside the suits, dewdrop.

It isn’t. The lighting is impossible to recreate on earth

Or, hmmm, maybe it's the 1/6th gravity, huh?

Huh? You don't think sand or ash reflects light? What?

Sounds like something you need to tell to a therapist.

@@rockethead7 🤣 hey man relax

If there were stars in the pictures, the moon and astronauts would be blindingly bright

@@SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 🤔

@@Danielllllllllllllllllllllll And?

@@SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer and so?

Whatever. It doesn't alter the reality of the Apollo missions. Thousands of scientists from around the world (that is, not just the USA) have studied the Apollo Moon rocks for the last 50 years.

Incorrect. Thousands of scientists from around the world (that is, not just the USA) have studied the Apollo Moon rocks for the last 50 years. The only way those rocks could be on the Earth is that they were collected from the Moon by humans and brought to the Earth.

Sorry, you are wrong. Things in these videos have been shown to accelerate at the speed of gravity on the Moon, not the Earth. The dirt that is flying away from being kicked is behaving like that because of the low gravity, not the air. There is literally no moonwalk video where dust billows like it does on Earth.

Apollo was part of the Space Race, which was Cold War propaganda. It was simply part of its time.

Kubrick had nothing to do with Apollo.

and neither did Kubick 🙄

I assume you have proof to back that up?

Why do you think it's fake? Because it doesn't look like Hollywood?

Looks like you haven’t even done even a little bit of research on what you just said to back it up🙂

To the untrained, paranoid eye.

What about that time? The object at the top of the screen? That was part of the rover.

It's the alignment handle of the dish mounted to the rover.

Apollo was real. The missions brought ~380 kilograms of Moon rock to the Earth which have been studied by thousands of scientists from around the world. The Soviets accepted the reality of Apollo, after first checking very carefully to confirm it was real.

Yes you can. The sound was transmitted through the hammer, the spacesuit and the astronaut's body to his microphone.

The Moon has gravity. It is about one-sixth that of the Earth. Things fall to the ground on the Moon exactly as they do on the Earth...except for the lower gravity and lack of air. The lower gravity means things accelerate more slowly. The lack of air means everything falls at the same speed.

There are two reasons. First, because the Moon has less gravity than the Earth, the same amount of effort makes things move further. Second, because the Moon has no air, light objects fall the same way dense objects do. There is video from Apollo 15 where an astronaut drops a hammer and a feather, and they fall at the same (slow) speed.

It really is an impressively enormous set 🙄

The Apollo program was a thing of the 1960s. It was a very different time from now. The Cold War was at its peak, and the US government thought it was worth spending huge amounts of money to win a propaganda victory over the USSR in the field of space/science and technology.

They are too faint to be resolved by the TV camera. It was daytime, so the cameras (TV and photographic) were exposed for sunlight conditions. Also, the TV was pretty low resolution.

@@maxfan1591 🤔🤔🤔

@@Danielllllllllllllllllllllll Okay...any issues I can help you with? If not, feel free to talk to any professional photographer.

@@maxfan1591 🤔🤔🤔🤔

So, you didn't want an answer to your question... shocker.

And your evidence is...what?

The landing sites from Apollo 12 onwards were chosen because they would provide insights into the geological history of the Moon. For example, the Apollo 12 landing site was chosen so that the crew could investigate (a) an unmanned spacecraft which landed there two years earlier, (b) sample the rocks of their landing site in the Ocean of Storms, and (c) sample the ejecta from the Copernicus Crater 400 kilometres away.

I don't understand it, therefore it's fake.

It was state of the art for the 1960s and 1970s.

@@maxfan1591 I think the Hoax was to divert money to the ICBM program. Where did the moon money go?

Земля плоская

@@smile77jkpt Go away annoying Russian person.

All the Apollo missions were real.